только для медицинских специалистов

Консультант врача

Электронная медицинская библиотека

Раздел 11 / 26
Страница 2 / 2

Список литературы

Внимание! Часть функций, например, копирование текста к себе в конспект, озвучивание и т.д. могут быть доступны только в режиме постраничного просмотра.Режим постраничного просмотра

  1. Giacino J.T. et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: Disorders of consciousness // Neurology. Elsevier Inc, 2018. Vol. 91, № 10. P. 450–460.
  2. Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical Aspects of the Persistent Vegetative State // N. Engl. J. Med. 1994. Vol. 330, № 21. P. 1499–1508.
  3. Giacino J.T. et al. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. // Neurology. JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute, 2048 Oak Tree Road, Edison, NJ 08820, USA. jgiacino@solarishs.org, 2002. Vol. 58, № 3. P. 349–353.
  4. Posner J.B. et al. Plum and Posner’s Diagnosis and Treatment of Stupor and Coma. Oxford University Press, 2019.
  5. Кондратьева Е.А., Яковенко И.В. Вегетативное состояние (этиология, патогенез, диагностика и лечение). Санкт-Петербург: РНХИ, 2014. 361 p.
  6. van Erp W.S. et al. The vegetative state: Prevalence, misdiagnosis, and treatment limitations // J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. Elsevier, 2015. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 85.e9-85.e14.
  7. Ní Lochlainn M. et al. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: a review of the literature and preliminary survey of prevalence in Ireland // Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2013. Vol. 182, № 1. P. 7–15.
  8. Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical Aspects of the Persistent Vegetative State // N. Engl. J. Med. 1994. Vol. 330, № 22. P. 1572–1579.
  9. Park S.Y. et al. Clinical Stage of Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease // Alzheimer’s Dement. 2014. Vol. 10, № 4. P. P532–P533.
  10. Wang X. et al. Three sporadic cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in China and their clinical analysis // Exp. Ther. Med. 2017. Vol. 14, № 3. P. 2664–2670.
  11. Walshe T.M. Persistent Vegetative State // Arch. Neurol. 1985. Vol. 42, № 11. P. 1045.
  12. Кондратьева Е.А., Вознюк И.А. Руководство по неврологическому осмотру пациента с длительным нарушением сознания. СПб: Фолиант, 2019. 56 p.
  13. Schnakers C., Laureys S. Coma and disorders of consciousness: Second edition // Coma and Disorders of Consciousness: Second Edition. 2017. Vol. 118. 1–276 p.
  14. Wade D.T. How many patients in a prolonged disorder of consciousness might need a best interests meeting about starting or continuing gastrostomy feeding? // Clin. Rehabil. 2018. Vol. 32, № 11. P. 1551– 1564.
  15. Pichler G., Fazekas F. Cardiopulmonary arrest is the most frequent cause of the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome: A prospective population-based cohort study in Austria // Resuscitation. 2016. Vol. 103. P. 94– 98.
  16. Donis J., Kräftner B. The prevalence of patients in a vegetative state and minimally conscious state in nursing homes in Austria. // Brain Inj. 2011. Vol. 25, № 11. P. 1101–1107.
  17. Pisa F.E. et al. The prevalence of vegetative and minimally conscious states: a systematic review and methodological appraisal. // J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014. Vol. 29, № 4. P. E23-30.
  18. Giovannetti A.M. et al. Burden of caregivers of patients in Vegetative State and Minimally Conscious State // Acta Neurol. Scand. 2013. Vol. 127, № 1. P. 10–18.
  19. Белкин В.А. et al. Система маршрутизации пациентов с последствиями острой церебральной недостаточности как инструмент сбора эпидемиологических данных о нарушениях сознания // (в печати).
  20. Giacino J.T. et al. Comprehensive systematic review update summary: Disorders of consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the // Neurology. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medici: Elsevier Inc, 2018. Vol. 91, № 10. P. 461–470.
  21. Kondziella D. et al. European Academy of Neurology guideline on the diagnosis of coma and other disorders of consciousness // Eur. J. Neurol. 2020. Vol. 27, № 5. P. 741–756.
  22. Childs N.L., Mercer W.N., Childs H.W. Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state // Neurology. 1993. Vol. 43, № 8. P. 1465–1465.
  23. Andrews K. et al. Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit. // BMJ. 1996. Vol. 313, № 7048. P. 13–16.
  24. Schnakers C. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. // BMC Neurol. Coma Science Group, Cyclotron Research Center, University of Liege, Belgium. c.schnakers@hotmail.com, 2009. Vol. 9. P. 35.
  25. Bruno M.A. et al. From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: Recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness // J. Neurol. 2011. Vol. 258, № 7. P. 1373–1384.

  1. Bruno M.-A. et al. Subcategorising the minimally conscious state based on cerebral metabolism PET studies // Nineteenth Meeting of the European Neurological Society 20–24 June 2009, Milan, Italy. 2009. Vol. 256, № S2. P. S30–S31.
  2. Белкин А.А. et al. Неврологическая диагностика при заболеваниях и повреждениях центральной нервной системы // Национальное руководство по интенсивной терапии. 2nd ed. / ed. Проценко Д.Н., Заболотских И.Б. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2020. P. 683–705.
  3. Teasdale G., Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. // Lancet (London, England). 1974. Vol. 2, № 7872. P. 81–84.
  4. Teasdale G. et al. The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. // Lancet. Neurol. 2014. Vol. 13, № 8. P. 844–854.
  5. Пирадов М.А. et al. Шкала комы Глазго (Glasgow Coma Scale, GCS): лингвокультурная адаптация русскоязычной версии // Журнал имени Н.В. Склифосовского «Неотложная медицинская помощь». 2021. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 91–99.
  6. Wijdicks E.F.M. et al. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score. // Ann. Neurol. 2005. Vol. 58, № 4. P. 585–593.
  7. Пирадов М.А. et al. Шкала подробной оценки состояния ареактивных пациентов (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness, FOUR): перевод и лингвокультурная адаптация русскоязычной версии // Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. 2019. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 47–54.
  8. Савин И.А., Фокин М.С., Лубнин А.Ю. Рекомендации по интенсивной терапии у пациентов с нейрохирургической патологией. 4th ed. Москва: НИИ нейрохирургии им. акад. Н. Н. Бурденко/ООО "ИПК “Индиго,” 2016. 200 p.
  9. Пирадов М.А. et al. Хронические нарушения сознания: терминология и диагностические критерии Результаты первого заседания Российской рабочей группы по проблемам хронических нарушений сознания // Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. 2020. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 5–16.
  10. Whyte J., Nakase-Richardson R. Disorders of Consciousness: Outcomes, Comorbidities, and Care Needs // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2013. Vol. 94, № 10. P. 1851–1854.
  11. Royal College of Physicians. Prolonged disorders of consciousness following sudden onset brain injury: National clinical guidelines. London, 2020. 200 p.
  12. КРЫЛОВ В.В. et al. Рекомендации по диагностике и реверсии остаточного нейромышечного блока в нейрохирургии // Вестник интенсивной терапии. 2011. № 4. P. 52–62.
  13. Majerus S. et al. The problem of aphasia in the assessment of consciousness in brain-damaged patients // Prog. Brain Res. 2009. Vol. 177, № C. P. 49–61.
  14. Giacino J.T. et al. Behavioral assessment in patients with disorders of consciousness: gold standard or fool’s gold? // Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier, 2009. Vol. 177, № C. P. 33–48.
  15. Løvstad M. et al. Reliability and diagnostic characteristics of the JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: Exploring the influence of raters level of experience // J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010. Vol. 25, № 5. P. 349–356.
  16. Seel R.T. et al. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: Evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2010. Vol. 91, № 12. P. 1795–1813.
  17. Seel R.T. et al. Assessment scales for disorders of consciousness: Evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice and research // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Elsevier Inc., 2010. Vol. 91, № 12. P. 1795– 1813.
  18. Kalmar K., Giacino J.T. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale--Revised // Neuropsychol Rehabil. JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute at JFK Medical Center, Brain Trauma Unit/3 ER/Neuropsychology, 65 James Street, Edison, NJ 08818, USA. kkalmar@solarishs.org, 2005. Vol. 15, № 3–4. P. 454–460.
  19. Iazeva E.G. et al. A Russian validation study of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) // Brain Inj. № Published online: 02 Nov 2018.
  20. Wannez S. et al. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. // Ann. Neurol. 2017. Vol. 81, № 6. P. 883–889.
  21. Forgacs P.B. et al. Preservation of electroencephalographic organization in patients with impaired consciousness and imaging-based evidence of command-following. // Ann. Neurol. 2014. Vol. 76, № 6. P. 869–879.
  22. Estraneo A. et al. Standard EEG in diagnostic process of prolonged disorders of consciousness. // Clin. Neurophysiol. 2016. Vol. 127, № 6. P. 2379–2385.
  23. Azabou E. et al. Value and mechanisms of EEG reactivity in the prognosis of patients with impaired consciousness: a systematic review. // Crit. Care. 2018. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 184.
  24. Landsness E. et al. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioural changes in vigilance in vegetative state and minimally conscious state // Brain. 2011. Vol. 134, № 8. P. 2222–2232.
  25. Cologan V. et al. Sleep in the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state // J. Neurotrauma. 2013. Vol. 30, № 5. P. 339–346.
  26. Malinowska U. et al. Electroencephalographic profiles for differentiation of disorders of consciousness. // Biomed. Eng. Online. 2013. Vol. 12. P. 109.
  27. de Biase S. et al. The importance of polysomnography in the evaluation of prolonged disorders of consciousness: sleep recordings more adequately correlate than stimulus-related evoked potentials with patients’ clinical status. // Sleep Med. 2014. Vol. 15, № 4. P. 393–400.
  28. Pavlov Y.G. et al. Night sleep in patients with vegetative state. // J. Sleep Res. 2017. Vol. 26, № 5. P. 629– 640.
  29. Lesenfants D. et al. Electromyographic decoding of response to command in disorders of consciousness // Neurology. 2016. Vol. 87, № 20. P. 2099–2107.
  30. Landsness E. et al. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioural changes in vigilance in vegetative state and minimally conscious state. // Brain. 2011. Vol. 134, № Pt 8. P. 2222–2232.
  31. Pavlov Y.G. et al. Night sleep in patients with vegetative state. // J. Sleep Res. 2017. Vol. 26, № 5. P. 629– 640.
  32. Naro A. et al. Cortical Responsiveness to Nociceptive Stimuli in Patients with Chronic Disorders of Consciousness: Do C-Fiber Laser Evoked Potentials Have a Role? // PLoS One / ed. Ward L.M. 2015. Vol. 10, № 12. P. e0144713.
  33. Casarotto S. et al. Stratification of unresponsive patients by an independently validated index of brain complexity // Ann. Neurol. 2016. Vol. 80, № 5. P. 718–729.
  34. Stender J. et al. Diagnostic precision of PET imaging and functional MRI in disorders of consciousness: a clinical validation study. // Lancet (London, England). Lancet, 2014. Vol. 384, № 9942. P. 514–522.
  35. Sitt J.D. et al. Large scale screening of neural signatures of consciousness in patients in a vegetative or minimally conscious state // Brain. 2014. Vol. 137, № 8. P. 2258–2270.
  36. Forgacs P.B. et al. Preservation of electroencephalographic organization in patients with impaired consciousness and imaging-based evidence of command-following // Ann. Neurol. 2014. Vol. 76, № 6. P. 869–879.
  37. АЛЕКСЕЕВА Е.В. et al. Прогностическая оценка сна у пациентов в вегетативном состоянии // Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2010. Vol. 4. P. 38–42.
  38. Kondratyeva E.A. et al. Zolpidem Action During Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness (Case Report) // Gen. Reanimatol. 2019. Vol. 15, № 5. P. 44–60.
  39. Clauss R.P. et al. Extraordinary arousal from semi-comatose state on zolpidem. A case report. // S. Afr. Med. J. 2000. Vol. 90, № 1. P. 68–72.
  40. Clauss R., Nel W. Effect of Zolpidem on Brain Injury and Diaschisis as Detected by 99mTc HMPAO Brain SPECT in Humans // Arzneimittelforschung. 2011. Vol. 54, № 10. P. 641–646.
  41. Bomalaski M.N., Smith S.R. Improved Arousal and Motor Function Using Zolpidem in a Patient With Space-Occupying Intracranial Lesions: A Case Report. // PM R. 2017. Vol. 9, № 8. P. 831–833.
  42. Thonnard M. et al. Effect of zolpidem in chronic disorders of consciousness: a prospective open-label study. // Funct. Neurol. Vol. 28, № 4. P. 259–264.
  43. Whyte J. et al. Zolpidem and Restoration of Consciousness // Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014.
  44. Приказ Минздрава РФ от 31 июля 2020 г. N 788Н об утверждении порядка организации медицинской реабилитации взрослых. Российская Федерация, 2020.
  45. Фуфаева Е.В., Микадзе Ю.В., Лукьянов В.И. Нейропсихологическая диагностика сниженного уровня состояния сознания после тяжелой черепно-мозговой травмы у детей // Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 2017. Vol. 117, № 11. P. 33–40.
  46. Ковязина М.С., Фомина К.А. К вопросу о теоретическом обосновании клинико-психологического подхода к реабилитации больных с измененными состояниями сознания // Cons. Medicum. 2017. Vol. 19, № 2.1. P. 53–56.
  47. Fomina K.A., Varako N.A. Clinical psychological approach to the rehabilitation of patients in a state of the depression of consciousness after suffering a stroke // Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2018. P. 41.
  48. Нейропсихологическая диагностика и реабилитация пациентов с нарушениями сознания после повреждения головного мозга. Методические рекомедации Российского психологического общества, Союза реабилитологов России, Национальной ассоциации по борьбе с инсульто. Москва, 2019. 81 p.
  49. Aubinet C. et al. Brain, Behavior, and Cognitive Interplay in Disorders of Consciousness: A Multiple Case Study. // Front. Neurol. 2018. Vol. 9. P. 665.
  50. Быкова В.И., Лукьянов В.И., Фуфаева Е.В. Диалог с пациентом при угнетении сознания после глубоких повреждений головного мозга // Консультативная психология и психотерапия. 2015. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 9–31.
  51. Royal College of Physicians. Management and care of tracheostomised patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness during the COVID-19 crisis. London, 2020. 15 p.
  52. Giacino J.T. et al. Placebo-Controlled Trial of Amantadine for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury // N. Engl. J. Med. 2012. Vol. 366, № 9. P. 819–826.
  53. Schnakers C. et al. Measuring the effect of amantadine in chronic anoxic minimally conscious state. // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2008. Vol. 79, № 2. P. 225–227.

  1. Estraneo A. et al. Clinical and electroencephalographic on–off effect of amantadine in chronic non- traumatic minimally conscious state // Journal of Neurology. 2015.
  2. Sarà M. et al. An unexpected recovery from permanent vegetative state // Brain Inj. 2007.
  3. Al-Khodairy A.T. et al. Influence of intrathecal baclofen on the level of consciousness and mental functions after extremely severe traumatic brain injury: Brief report // Brain Inj. 2015.
  4. Margetis K. et al. Intrathecal baclofen associated with improvement of consciousness disorders in spasticity patients // Neuromodulation. 2014.
  5. Pistoia F. et al. Intrathecal Baclofen: Effects on Spasticity, Pain, and Consciousness in Disorders of Consciousness and Locked-in Syndrome // Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2015. Vol. 19, № 1.
  6. Александрова Е.В., Зайцев О.С., Потапов А.А. Клинические синдромы дисфункции нейромедиаторных систем при тяжелой травме мозга // Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 2015. Vol. 115, № 7. P. 40.
  7. Александрова Е.В., Зайцев О.С., Потапов А.А. Фармакологическая модуляция сознания: терапия посткоматозных и бессознательных состояний // Посттравматические бессознательные состояния (фундаментальные и клинические аспекты) / ed. Лихтерман Л.., Царенко С.В. Москва: ГЭОТАР- Медиа, 2015. P. 306–337.
  8. Александрова Е.В. Синдромы дисфункции нейромедиаторных систем в процессе восстановления сознания после тяжелой черепно-мозговой травмы. 2013. 22–23 p.
  9. Зайцев О.С. Психопатология тяжелой черепно-мозговой травмы. Москва: МЕДПРЕСС-информ, 2011. 336 p.
  10. Зайцев О.С., Царенко С.В. Нейрореаниматология. Выход из комы (терапия посткоматозных состояний). 2nd-е, пер. ed. Москва: Литасс, 2014. 160 p.
  11. Зайцев О.С. Выбор нейрометаболического средства при тяжелой травме мозга // Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 2010. Vol. 110, № 9. P. 66–69.
  12. Nitsche M.A. et al. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex // J. Physiol. 2005.
  13. Thibaut A. et al. Controlled clinical trial of repeated prefrontal tDCS in patients with chronic minimally conscious state // Brain Inj. 2017.
  14. Angelakis E. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation effects in disorders of consciousness. // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014. Vol. 95, № 2. P. 283–289.
  15. Estraneo A. et al. Repeated transcranial direct current stimulation in prolonged disorders of consciousness: A double-blind cross-over study // J. Neurol. Sci. 2017.
  16. Zhang Y. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: Combined behavioral and event-related potential evidence // Front. Neurol. 2017. Vol. 8, № NOV.
  17. Martens G. et al. Randomized controlled trial of home-based 4-week tDCS in chronic minimally conscious state // Brain Stimul. Elsevier Inc., 2018. Vol. 11, № 5. P. 982–990.
  18. Guerra A. et al. Disorders Of Consciousness And Electrophysiological Treatment Strategies: A Review Of The Literature And New Perspectives // Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013.
  19. Gorsler A. et al. Interhemispheric effects of high and low frequency rTMS in healthy humans // Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003.
  20. Burke M.J., Fried P.J., Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: Neurophysiological and clinical applications. // Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2019. Vol. 163. P. 73–92.
  21. Xia X. et al. Effects of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in disorders of consciousness // Front. Neurol. 2017. Vol. 8, № MAY. P. 1–8.
  22. Legostaeva L. et al. Stimulation of the angular gyrus improves the level of consciousness // Brain Sci. 2019. Vol. 9, № 5.
  23. O’Neal C.M. et al. Patient Outcomes in Disorders of Consciousness Following Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data // Front. Neurol. 2021. Vol. 12.
  24. Magrassi L. et al. Results of a prospective study (CATS) on the effects of thalamic stimulation in minimally conscious and vegetative state patients. // J. Neurosurg. 2016. Vol. 125, № 4. P. 972–981.
  25. Chudy D. et al. Deep brain stimulation for the early treatment of the minimally conscious state and vegetative state: experience in 14 patients // J. Neurosurg. 2017.
  26. Schiff N.D. et al. Behavioural improvements with thalamic stimulation after severe traumatic brain injury // Nature. 2007.
  27. Thibaut A. et al. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. // Lancet. Neurol. 2019. Vol. 18, № 6. P. 600–614.
  28. Хронические нарушения сознания. 2nd ed. / ed. Пирадов М.А. Москва: Горячая линия-Телеком, 2020. 288 p.
  29. Thibaut A. et al. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness // Lancet Neurol. Elsevier Ltd, 2019. Vol. 18, № 6. P. 600–614.
  30. Estraneo A. et al. Do Medical Complications Impact Long-Term Outcomes in Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness? // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018. Vol. 99, № 12. P. 2523-2531.e3.
  31. Белкин А.А., Лейдерман И.Н., Давыдова Н.С. Реабилитация в интенсивной терапии // Национальное руководство по интенсивной терапии. 2nd ed. / ed. Проценко Д.Н., Заболотских И.Б. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2020. P. 818–844.
  32. Klingshirn H. et al. Quality of evidence of rehabilitation interventions in longterm care for people with severe disorders of consciousness after brain injury: A systematic review // J. Rehabil. Med. 2015. Vol. 47, № 7. P. 577–585.
  33. Интенсивная терапия. Национальное руководство. В 2-х томах. Том 1. 2nd ed. / ed. Заболотских И.Б., Проценко Д.Н. ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2021. 1152 p.
  34. Perin C. et al. Parameters Influencing Tracheostomy Decannulation in Patients Undergoing Rehabilitation after severe Acquired Brain Injury (sABI) // Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2017. Vol. 21, № 04. P. 382– 389.
  35. Santus P. et al. A systematic review on tracheostomy decannulation: a proposal of a quantitative semiquantitative clinical score // BMC Pulm. Med. 2014. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 201.
  36. Wijdicks E.F.M. Management of the comatose patient. 2017. P. 117–129.
  37. Белкин А.А. et al. Нутритивная поддержка в неврологии и нейрохирургии // Парентеральное и энтеральное питание: национальное руководство / ed. Хубутия М.Ш., Попрова Т.С., Салтанов А.И. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2014. P. 401–418.
  38. Недостаточность питания: нутритивная поддержка и регидратационная терапия у взрослых пациентов, нуждающихся в паллиативной медицинской помощи. 2017. 79 p.
  39. Xiao G. et al. Comparing the measured basal metabolic rates in patients with chronic disorders of consciousness to the estimated basal metabolic rate calculated from common predictive equations. // Clin. Nutr. 2017. Vol. 36, № 5. P. 1397–1402.
  40. Mélotte E. et al. Is oral feeding compatible with an unresponsive wakefulness syndrome? // J. Neurol. 2018. Vol. 265, № 4. P. 954–961.
  41. Brady S.L. et al. Persons with disorders of consciousness: Are oral feedings safe/effective? // Brain Inj. 2006. Vol. 20, № 13–14. P. 1329–1334.
  42. Splaingard M.L. et al. Aspiration in rehabilitation patients: videofluoroscopy vs bedside clinical assessment. // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1988. Vol. 69, № 8. P. 637–640.
  43. Linden P., Kuhlemeier K. V, Patterson C. The probability of correctly predicting subglottic penetration from clinical observations. // Dysphagia. 1993. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 170–179.
  44. Mélotte E. et al. Swallowing in individuals with disorders of consciousness: A cohort study. // Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2020.
  45. McRae J. et al. The role of speech and language therapists in the intensive care unit // J. Intensive Care Soc. 2019. P. 175114371987568.
  46. Белкин А.А., Ершов В.И., Иванова Г.Е. Нарушение глотания при неотложных состояниях — постэкстубационная дисфагия // Анестезиология и реаниматология. 2018. № 4. P. 76–82.
  47. Meyfroidt G., Baguley I.J., Menon D.K. Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity: the storm after acute brain injury // Lancet Neurol. 2017. Vol. 16, № 9. P. 721–729.
  48. Lucca L.F. et al. Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity Rate in Vegetative or Minimally Conscious State after Acquired Brain Injury Evaluated by Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity Assessment Measure. // J. Neurotrauma. 2019. Vol. 36, № 16. P. 2430–2434.
  49. Samuel S. et al. Pharmacologic Management of Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity After Brain Injury. // J. Neurosci. Nurs. 2016. Vol. 48, № 2. P. 82–89.
  50. Baguley I.J. et al. Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after acquired brain injury: consensus on conceptual definition, nomenclature, and diagnostic criteria. // J. Neurotrauma. 2014. Vol. 31, № 17. P. 1515–1520.
  51. Choi H.A. et al. Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity after acute brain injury. // Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2013. Vol. 13, № 8. P. 370.
  52. Zheng R.-Z. et al. Identification and Management of Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity After Traumatic Brain Injury. // Front. Neurol. 2020. Vol. 11. P. 81.
  53. Thomas A., Greenwald B.D. Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity and Clinical Considerations for Patients With Acquired Brain Injuries: A Narrative Review. // Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2019. Vol. 98, № 1. P. 65–72.
  54. Samuel S. et al. Pharmacologic Management of Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity After Brain Injury. // J. Neurosci. Nurs. 2016. Vol. 48, № 2. P. 82–89.
  55. Lucca L.F. et al. Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity Rate in Vegetative or Minimally Conscious State after Acquired Brain Injury Evaluated by Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity Assessment Measure. // J. Neurotrauma. 2019. Vol. 36, № 16. P. 2430–2434.
  56. van Erp W.S. et al. Unexpected emergence from the vegetative state: delayed discovery rather than late recovery of consciousness // J. Neurol. 2019. Vol. 266, № 12. P. 3144–3149.
  57. Kowalski R.G. et al. Impact of timing of ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement on outcome in posttraumatic hydrocephalus // J. Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 130, № 2. P. 406–417.
  58. Кравчук А.Д. et al. Ликворошунтирующие операции у пациентов с посттравматической гидроцефалией в вегетативном статусе и состоянии минимального сознания: анализ эффективности и безопасности // Вопросы нейрохирургии» имени Н. Н. Бурденко. 2019. Vol. 83, № 1. P. 17.
  59. Choi I. et al. Clinical Factors for the Development of Posttraumatic Hydrocephalus after Decompressive Craniectomy // J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2008. Vol. 43, № 5. P. 227.
  60. Доброхотова Т.А. et al. Влияние шунтирующих операций на психопатологическую симптоматику посттравматической гидроцефалии. // Вопросы нейрохирургии. 1997. Vol. 4. P. 12–14.
  61. Relkin N. et al. Diagnosing Idiopathic Normal-pressure Hydrocephalus // Neurosurgery. 2005. Vol. 57, № suppl_3. P. S2-4-S2-16.
  62. Relkin N. et al. Diagnosing Idiopathic Normal-pressure Hydrocephalus // Neurosurgery. 2005. Vol. 57, № suppl_3. P. S2-4-S2-16.
  63. Scollato A. et al. Is aqueductal stroke volume, measured with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging scans useful in predicting outcome of shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus? // Neurosurgery. 2008. Vol. 63, № 6. P. E1209; author reply E1209.
  64. Walchenbach R. et al. The value of temporary external lumbar CSF drainage in predicting the outcome of shunting on normal pressure hydrocephalus. // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2002. Vol. 72, № 4. P. 503–506.
  65. Wikkelso C. et al. The European iNPH Multicentre Study on the predictive values of resistance to CSF outflow and the CSF Tap Test in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2013. Vol. 84, № 5. P. 562–568.
  66. Marmarou A. et al. Posttraumatic ventriculomegaly: hydrocephalus or atrophy? A new approach for diagnosis using CSF dynamics. // J. Neurosurg. 1996. Vol. 85, № 6. P. 1026–1035.
  67. Mori E. et al. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. // Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo). 2012. Vol. 52, № 11. P. 775–809.
  68. Schnakers C., Zasler N. Assessment and Management of Pain in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness // PM&R. 2015. Vol. 7. P. S270–S277.
  69. Boly M. et al. Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study // Lancet Neurol. Elsevier Ltd, 2008. Vol. 7, № 11. P. 1013–1020.
  70. Chatelle C. et al. Pain issues in disorders of consciousness // Brain Inj. 2014. Vol. 28, № 9. P. 1202–1208.
  71. Bernat J.L. Patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome respond to the pain cries of other people // Neurology. 2013. Vol. 81, № 5. P. 513–513.
  72. Boly M. et al. Cerebral processing of auditory and noxious stimuli in severely brain injured patients: Differences between VS and MCS // Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2005. Vol. 15, № 3–4. P. 283–289.
  73. Barr J. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. // Crit. Care Med. 2013. Vol. 41, № 1. P. 263–306.
  74. Chatelle C. et al. A sensitive scale to assess nociceptive pain in patients with disorders of consciousness. // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2012. Vol. 83, № 12. P. 1233–1237.
  75. Schnakers C. et al. The Nociception Coma Scale: A new tool to assess nociception in disorders of consciousness // Pain. International Association for the Study of Pain, 2010. Vol. 148, № 2. P. 215–219.
  76. Haddad S.H., Arabi Y.M. Critical care management of severe traumatic brain injury in adults. // Scand. J. Trauma. Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2012. Vol. 20. P. 12.
  77. Fins J.J., Bernat J.L. Ethical, palliative, and policy considerations in disorders of consciousness // Neurology. 2018. Vol. 91, № 10. P. 471–475.
  78. Katz D.I. et al. Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1-4 year follow-up // Prog. Brain Res. 2009. Vol. 177, № C. P. 73–88.
  79. Hammond F.M. et al. Disorders of consciousness due to traumatic brain injury: Functional status ten years post-injury // J. Neurotrauma. 2019. Vol. 36, № 7. P. 1136–1146.
  80. Nakase-Richardson R. et al. Longitudinal Outcome of Patients with Disordered Consciousness in the NIDRR TBI Model Systems Programs // J. Neurotrauma. 2012. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 59–65.
  81. Whyte J. et al. Functional Outcomes in Traumatic Disorders of Consciousness: 5-Year Outcomes From the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2013. Vol. 94, № 10. P. 1855–1860.
  82. Seel R.T. et al. Specialized early treatment for persons with disorders of consciousness: Program components and outcomes // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2013. Vol. 94, № 10. P. 1908–1923.
  83. Elliott L., Walker L. Rehabilitation interventions for vegetative and minimally conscious patients // Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2005. Vol. 15, № 3–4. P. 480–493.
  84. Eapen B.C. et al. Disorders of Consciousness // Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2017. Vol. 28, № 2. P. 245–258.
  85. Giacino J.T. et al. Minimum Competency Recommendations for Programs That Provide Rehabilitation Services for Persons With Disorders of Consciousness: A Position Statement of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the National Institute on Disability, Independen // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2020. Vol. 101, № 6. P. 1072–1089.
  86. Федерация анестезиологов-реаниматологов РФ, Объединение нейроанестезиологов и нейрореаниматологов, Союз реабилитологов России. Реабилитация в интенсивной терапии. Клинические рекомендации. 2015. 35 p.
  87. Gill-Thwaites H., Elliott K.E., Munday R. SMART–Recognising the value of existing practice and introducing recent developments: leaving no stone unturned in the assessment and treatment of the PDOC patient // Neuropsychol. Rehabil. Taylor & Francis, 2018. Vol. 28, № 8. P. 1242–1253.
  88. Thibaut A. et al. Spasticity after stroke: Physiology, assessment and treatment // Brain Inj. 2013. Vol. 27, № 10. P. 1093–1105.
  89. O’Dwyer N.J., Ada L., Neilson P.D. Spasticity and muscle contracture following stroke // Brain. 1996. Vol. 119, № 5. P. 1737–1749.
  90. Sinkjér T. et al. Non-reflex and reflex mediated ankle joint stiffness in multiple sclerosis patients with spasticity // Muscle Nerve. 1993. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 69–76.
  91. Ansari N.N. et al. The interrater and intrarater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in the assessment of muscle spasticity: limb and muscle group effect. // NeuroRehabilitation. 2008. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 231– 237.
  92. Bohannon R.W., Smith M.B. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. // Phys. Ther. 1987. Vol. 67, № 2. P. 206–207.
  93. Bovend’Eerdt T.J. et al. The Effects of Stretching in Spasticity: A Systematic Review // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2008. Vol. 89, № 7. P. 1395–1406.
  94. Feldman P. Upper extremity casting and splinting // The Practical Management of Spasticity in Children and Adults / ed. Glenn M., Whyte J. Philadelphia, 1990.
  95. Sahin N., Ugurlu H., Albayrak I. The efficacy of electrical stimulation in reducing the post-stroke spasticity: a randomized controlled study // Disabil. Rehabil. 2012. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 151–156.
  96. Gracies J.-M. Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. I: Paresis and soft tissue changes // Muscle Nerve. 2005. Vol. 31, № 5. P. 535–551.
  97. Booth F.W. Effect of limb immobilization on skeletal muscle. // J. Appl. Physiol. 1982. Vol. 52, № 5. P. 1113–1118.
  98. Katalinic O.M. et al. Stretch interventions for contractures // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews / ed. Katalinic O.M. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2008.
  99. Очаговое повреждение головного мозга у взрослых: синдром спастичности: клинические рекомендации. 2nd-е ed. Москва: МЕДПРЕСС-информ, 2018. 95 p.
  100. Munday R. Vegetative and minimally conscious states: How can occupational therapists help? // Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 2005. Vol. 15, № 3–4. P. 503–513.
  101. Pope P.M. Posture management and special seating // Neurological Physiotherapy / ed. Edwards S. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone, 2002. P. 189–217.
  102. Krewer C. et al. Tilt table therapies for patients with severe disorders of consciousness: A randomized, controlled trial // PLoS One / ed. Glasauer S. Public Library of Science, 2015. Vol. 10, № 12. P. e0143180.
  103. Riberholt C.G. et al. Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation during Head Up Tilt in Patients with Severe Brain Injury // PLoS One / ed. Lionetti V. 2016. Vol. 11, № 5. P. e0154831.
  104. Frazzitta G. et al. Effectiveness of a Very Early Stepping Verticalization Protocol in Severe Acquired Brain Injured Patients: A Randomized Pilot Study in ICU // PLoS One / ed. Quinn T.J. 2016. Vol. 11, № 7. P. e0158030.
  105. Roberts H., Greenwood N. Speech and language therapy best practice for patients in prolonged disorders of consciousness: a modified Delphi study. // Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 2019. Vol. 54, № 5. P. 841– 854.
  106. The Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability. Guidelines for Speech and Language Therapists working with adults in a Disorder of Consciousness. London, 2019. 32 p.
  107. Pape T.L.-B. et al. Placebo-Controlled Trial of Familiar Auditory Sensory Training for Acute Severe Traumatic Brain Injury // Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 2015. Vol. 29, № 6. P. 537–547.
  108. Cheng L. et al. Do Sensory Stimulation Programs Have an Impact on Consciousness Recovery? // Front. Neurol. 2018. Vol. 9.
  109. Wood R.L. Critical analysis of the concept of sensory stimulation for patients in vegetative states. // Brain Inj. 1991. Vol. 5, № 4. P. 401–409.
  110. Игнатьева Н.С. Черепно-мозговая травма: фазы восстановления контакта с собой и миром и экзистенциально-аналитическая работа // Вопросы нейрохирургии имени Н. Н. Бурденко. 2014. Vol. 78, № 1. P. 83–90.
  111. Максакова О.А., Игнатьева Н.С., Зайцев О.С. О роли и принципах работы психолога в нейрохирургической клинике // Российский нейрохирургический журнал имени профессора А. Л. Поленова. 2016. Vol. 7, № 4. P. 37–44.
  112. Elvira de la Morena M.J., Cruzado J.A. Caregivers of patients with disorders of consciousness: coping and prolonged grief. // Acta Neurol. Scand. 2013. Vol. 127, № 6. P. 413–418.
  113. Лурия Р.А. Внутренняя картина болезней и иатрогенные заболевания. 4th ed. Москва: Медицина, 1977. 112 p.
  114. Holloway R.G. et al. Palliative and end-of-life care in stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. // Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45, № 6. P. 1887– 1916.
  115. Rossetti A.O., Rabinstein A.A., Oddo M. Neurological prognostication of outcome in patients in coma after cardiac arrest // Lancet Neurol. Elsevier Ltd, 2016. Vol. 15, № 6. P. 597–609.
  116. Bernat J.L. Prognostic Limitations of Syndromic Diagnosis in Disorders of Consciousness // AJOB Neurosci. 2016. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 46–48.
  117. Giacino J.T., Kalmar K. The Vegetative and Minimally Conscious States: A Comparison of Clinical Features and Functional Outcome // J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997. Vol. 12, № 4.
  118. Giacino J.T., Kalmar K., Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: Measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon an // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. JFK Johnson Rehabilitation Institute and New Jersey Neuroscience Institute, JFK Medical Center, Edison, NJ 08820, USA. jgiacino@solarishs.org, 2004. Vol. 85, № 12. P. 2020–2029.
  119. Супонева Н.А. et al. Валидация Модифицированной шкалы Эшворта (Modified Ashworth Scale) в России // Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. 2020. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 89–96.
  120. Lincoln N., Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. // Physiotherapy. 1979. Vol. 65, № 2. P. 48–51.