137. Stiff P.J. et al. Transplanted CD34 + Cell Dose Is Associated with Long-Term Platelet Count Recovery following Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or Multiple Myeloma // Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2011. Vol. 17, № 8. P. 1146–1153.
138. Passos-Coelho J.L. et al. Predictive factors for peripheral-blood progenitor-cell collections using a single large-volume leukapheresis after cyclophosphamide and granulocyte- macrophage colony-stimulating factor mobilization // J. Clin. Oncol. American Society of Clinical Oncology, 1995. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 705–714.
139. Hohaus S. et al. Successful autografting following myeloablative conditioning therapy with blood stem cells mobilized by chemotherapy plus rhG-CSF. // Exp. Hematol. 1993. Vol. 21, № 4. P. 508–514.
140. Покровская О.С., Менделеева Л.П., Гальцева И.В., Варламова Е.Ю., Капланская И.Б., Воробьев И.А., Грецов Е.М., Калинин Н.Н., Варламова С.В., Клясова Г.А., Тихонова Л.Ю. С.В.Г. Мобилизация гемопоэтических клеток крови у больных миеломной болезнью // Проблемы гематологии и переливания. 2003. P. 55–56.
141. Olivieri A. et al. Proposed definition of “poor mobilizer” in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: An analytic hierarchy process by ad hoc working group Gruppo ItalianoTrapianto di Midollo Osseo // Bone Marrow Transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2012. Vol. 47, № 3. P. 342–351.
142. Yang B.B., Kido A. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegfilgrastim // Clinical Pharmacokinetics. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2011. Vol. 50, № 5. P. 295–306.
143. Costa L.J. et al. Pegfilgrastim-versus filgrastim-based autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in the setting of preemptive use of plerixafor: Efficacy and cost analysis // Transfusion. Transfusion, 2012. Vol. 52, № 11. P. 2375–2381.
144. Dale D.C. et al. A systematic literature review of the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of filgrastim // Supportive Care in Cancer. Springer Verlag, 2018. Vol. 26, № 1. P. 7–20.
145. Smith T.J. et al. Recommendations for the use of WBC growth factors: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update // J. Clin. Oncol. American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2015. Vol. 33, № 28. P. 3199–3212.
146. Bilgin Y.M., De Greef G.E. Plerixafor for stem cell mobilization: The current status // Current Opinion in Hematology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2016. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 67–71.
147. Савченко В.Г. и др. Алгоритмы диагностики и протоколы лечения заболеваний системы крови. Москва: Практика, 2018. 1008 p.
148. Афанасьева О.И., Воинов В.А. Г.Ю.С. Экстракорпоральная гемокоррекция: терминология, языковые соответствия. СПб, 2016. P. 7–15.
149. Ikeda K. et al. Adverse Events Associated With Infusion of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Products: A Prospective and Multicenter Surveillance Study // Transfusion Medicine Reviews. W.B. Saunders, 2018. Vol. 32, № 3. P. 186–194.
150. Аксельрод Б.А. et al. Клиническое использование эритроцитсодержащих компонентов донорской крови // Гематология и трансфузиология. 2018. Vol. 63, № 4. P. 372–435.
151. Sutherland D.R. et al. The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry // Journal of Hematotherapy and Stem Cell Research. J Hematother, 1996. Vol. 5, № 3. P. 213–226.
152. Enric Carreras D.C., Mohty Mohamad K.N. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 2019. 702 p.
153. Frankiewicz A. et al. Comparable safety profile of BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) as conditioning before autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation. // Contemp. Oncol. (Poznan, Poland). Termedia Publishing, 2018. Vol. 22, № 2. P. 113–117.
154. Caballero M.D. et al. BEAM chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell support in lymphoma patients: analysis of efficacy, toxicity and prognostic factors // Bone Marrow Transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant, 1997. Vol. 20, № 6.
155. Mills W. et al. BEAM chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. // J. Clin. Oncol. J Clin Oncol, 1995. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 588–595.
156. Colita A. et al. LEAM vs. BEAM vs. CLV Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Malignant Lymphomas. Retrospective Comparison of Toxicity and Efficacy on 222 Patients in the First 100 Days After Transplant, On Behalf of the Romanian Society for Bon // Front. Oncol. Front Oncol, 2019. Vol. 9. P. 892.
157. Sharma A. et al. Comparison of BEAM vs. LEAM regimen in autologous transplant for lymphoma at AIIMS. // Springerplus. Springerplus, 2013. Vol. 2. P. 489.
158. Perz J.B. et al. LACE-conditioned autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma: treatment outcome and risk factor analysis in 67 patients from a single centre. // Bone Marrow Transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant, 2007. Vol. 39, № 1. P. 41–47.
159. Ramzi M. et al. Autologous noncryopreserved hematopoietic stem cell transplant with CEAM as a modified conditioning regimen in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: a single-center experience with a new protocol. // Exp. Clin. Transplant. Exp Clin Transplant, 2012. Vol. 10, № 2. P. 163–167.
160. Visani G. et al. XRCC1 399GG genotype predicts significantly longer overall survival in resistant lymphoma patients treated with Benda-EAM and ASCT // Bone Marrow Transplant. Nature Publishing Group, 2020. Vol. 55, № 4. P. 818–820.
161. Visani G. et al. BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) before autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and effective for resistant/relapsed lymphoma patients. // Blood. 2011. Vol. 118, № 12. P. 3419–3425.
162. Auner H.W. et al. Infectious complications after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Comparison of patients with acute myeloid leukemia, malignant lymphoma, and multiple myeloma // Ann. Hematol. Ann Hematol, 2002. Vol. 81, № 7. P. 374–377.