Список литературы

Глава 18

1. Whitworth M., Bricker L., Mullan C. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy // Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015. № 7.

2. Mercé L.T. Ultrasound markers of implantation // The Ultrasound Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002. Т. 2. № 2. С. 110–123.

3. Aghahoseini M. et al. Assessment of endometrial-subendometrial blood flow detected by color Doppler sonography and uterine receptivity in infertile women // Acta Medica Iranica. 2008. С. 461–466.

4. Ng E.H.Y. et al. The role of endometrial and subendometrial blood flows measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in the prediction of pregnancy during IVF treatment // Human Reproduction. 2006. Т. 21, № 1. С. 164–170.

5. Imoedemhe D.A.G. et al. Ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness on different ovarian stimulation regimens during in-vitro fertilization // Human Reproduction. 1987. Т. 2, № 7. С. 545–547.

6. Ivanovski M. The role of ultrasound in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments // In vitro fertilization — innovative clinical and laboratory aspects. 2012. С. 31.

7. Bassil S. Changes in endometrial thickness, width, length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome during ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization // Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2001. Т. 18, № 3. С. 258–263.

8. Friedler S. et al. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review // Human reproduction update. 1996. Т. 2, № 4. С. 323–335.

9. Leibovitz Z. et al. Assessment of endometrial receptivity for gestation in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, using endometrial thickness and the endometrium‐myometrium relative echogenicity coefficient // Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1999. Т. 14, № 3. С. 194–199.

10. Dickey R.P. et al. Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies // Human Reproduction. 1992. Т. 7, № 3. С. 418–421.

11. Lee A. et al. Endometrial volume change during spontaneous menstrual cycles: volumetry by transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound // Fertility and sterility. 1997. Т. 68, № 5. С. 831–835.

12. Raine‐Fenning N.J. et al. Defining endometrial growth during the menstrual cycle with three‐dimensional ultrasound // BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2004. Т. 111, № 9. С. 944–949.

13. Raga F. et al. Assessment of endometrial volume by three-dimensional ultrasound prior to embryo transfer: clues to endometrial receptivity // Human Reproduction. 1999. Т. 14, № 11. С. 2851–2854.

14. Zollner U. et al. Endometrial volume as assessed by three-dimensional ultrasound is a predictor of pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer // Fertility and sterility. 2003. Т. 80, № 6. С. 1515–1517.

15. Mercé L.T., Barco M.J., Bau S. et al. Are endometrial parameters by three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler angiography related to in vitro fertilization embryo transfer outcome? // Fertil Steril. 2008; 89(1): 111–7.

16. Parsons A.K., Parada C., Parsons M. et al. Ultrasound correlation with endometrial histology. Gynecologic investigation, 38^th Annual Meeting, San Antonio, Texas, March 20–23, 1991; Abstract 560, P. 378.

17. Tetlow R.L., Richmond I., Manton D.J. et al. Histological analysis of the uterine junctional zone as seen by transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 14(3): 188–93.

18. Sher G., Herbert C., Maassarani G. et al. Assessment of the late proliferative phase еndometrium by ultrasonography in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). Hum Reprod. 1991; 6(2): 232–7.

19. Tan S.L., Zaidi J., Campbell S., Doyle P., Collins W. Blood flow changes in the ovarian and uterine arteries during the normal menstrual cycle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Sep; 175(3 Pt 1): 625–31.

20. Bourne T.H., Hagström H.G., Granberg S., Josefsson B., Hahlin M., Hellberg P., Hamberger L., Collins W.P. Ultrasound studies of vascular and morphological changes in the human uterus after a positive self-test for the urinary luteinizing hormone surge. Hum Reprod. 1996 Feb; 11(2): 369–75.

21. Mercé L.T. Doppler de los cambios ováricos y endometriales preimplantatorios. In: Kurjak A., Carrera J.M. (Eds). Ecografía en Medicina Materno-Fetal. Barcelona: Masson; 2000. P. 87–104.

22. Costa M.A. The endocrine function of human placenta: an overview. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Jan; 32(1): 14–43.

23. Wamaitha S.E., Niakan K.K. Human Pre-gastrulation Development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2018; 128: 295–338.

24. Goswamy R.K., Williams G., Steptoe P.C. Decreased uterine perfusion — a cause of infertility // Hum Reprod. 1988 Nov; 3(8): 955–9.

25. Mercé LT. Estudio Doppler de la implantación y placentación inicial. In: Kurjak A., Carrera J.M. (Eds). Ecografía en Medicina Materno-Fetal. Barcelona: Masson; 2000. P. 113–36.

26. Steer C.V., Campbell S., Tan S.L., Crayford T., Mills C., Mason B.A., Collins W.P. The use of transvaginal color flow imaging after in vitro fertilization to identify optimum uterine conditions before embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1992 Feb; 57(2): 372–6.

27. Ivanovski M., Damcevski N., Radevska B., Doicev G. Assessment of uterine artery and arcuate artery blood flow by transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration as predictors of pregnancy in an in vitro fertilization program. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2012; 51(2): 55–60.

28. Coulam C.B., Bustillo M., Soenksen D.M., Britten S. Ultrasonographic predictors of implantation after assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril. 1994 Nov; 62(5): 1004–10.

29. Son J.B., Jeong J.E., Joo J.K., Na Y.J., Kim C.W., Lee K.S. Measurement of endometrial and uterine vascularity by transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting pregnancy outcome during frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles // J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014 Jun; 40(6): 1661–7.

30. Deichert U., Albrand-Thielmann C., van de Sandt M. Doppler-sonographic pelvic blood flow measurements and their prognostic value in terms of luteal phase and implantation // Hum Reprod. 1996 Aug; 11(8): 1591–3.

31. Tamura H., Takasaki A., Taniguchi K., Matsuoka A., Shimamura K., Sugino N. Changes in blood-flow impedance of the human corpus luteum throughout the luteal phase and during early pregnancy // Fertil Steril. 2008 Dec; 90(6): 2334–9.

32. Timor-Tritsch I.E., Farine D., Rosen M.G. A close look at early embryonic development with the high-frequency transvaginal transducer // American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 1988. Т. 159, № 3. С. 676–681.

33. de Crespigny L.C., Cooper D., McKenna M. Early detection of intrauterine pregnancy with ultrasound // Journal of ultrasound in medicine. 1988. Т. 7, № 1. С. 7–10.

34. Doubilet P.M., Benson C.B. Atlas of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology: a multimedia reference. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.

35. Detti L. et al. Early pregnancy ultrasound measurements and prediction of first trimester pregnancy loss: A logistic model // Scientific reports. 2020. Т. 10, № 1. С. 1–10.

36. Nyberg D.A., Laing F.C., Filly R.A. Threatened abortion: sonographic distinction of normal and abnormal gestation sacs // Radiology. 1986. Т. 158, № 2. С. 397–400.

37. Nyberg D. A. et al. Ultrasonographic differentiation of the gestational sac of early intrauterine pregnancy from the pseudogestational sac of ectopic pregnancy // Radiology. 1983. Т. 146, № 3. С. 755–759.

38. Levi C.S., Lyons E.A., Lindsay D.J. Early diagnosis of nonviable pregnancy with endovaginal US // Radiology. 1988. Т. 167, № 2. С. 383–385.

39. Dillon E.H., Feyock A.L., Taylor K.J. Pseudogestational sacs: Doppler US differentiation from normal or abnormal intrauterine pregnancies // Radiology. 1990. Т. 176, № 2. С. 359–364.

40. Kuhn P., Brizot M.L., Pandya P.P., Snijders R.J., Nicolaides K.H. Crown-rump length in chromosomally abnormal fetuses at 10 to 13 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jan; 172(1 Pt 1): 32–5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90080-2. PMID: 7847557.

41. Reljic M. The significance of crown-rump length measurement for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome of threatened abortion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun; 17(6): 510–2. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00370.x. PMID: 11422973.

42. DeVilbiss E.A., Mumford S.L., Sjaarda L.A., Connell M.T., Plowden T.C., Andriessen V.C., Perkins N.J., Hill M.J., Silver R.M., Schisterman E.F. Prediction of pregnancy loss by early first trimester ultrasound characteristics // Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug; 223(2): 242.e1–242.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 Feb 25. PMID: 32109464; PMCID: PMC7994016.

43. Langman’s medical embryology. Sadler, T W (Thomas W); Langman, Jan. Medical embryology. 12^th ed. / T.W. Sadler. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, c2012.

44. Papaioannou G.I. et al. Normal ranges of embryonic length, embryonic heart rate, gestational sac diameter and yolk sac diameter at 6–10 weeks // Fetal diagnosis and therapy. 2010. Т. 28, № 4. С. 207–219.

45. Lindsay D.J., Lovett I.S., Lyons E.A., Levi C.S., Zheng X.H., Holt S.C., Dashefsky S.M. Yolk sac diameter and shape at endovaginal US: predictors of pregnancy outcome in the first trimester. Radiology. 1992 Apr; 183(1): 115–8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.183.1.1549656.

46. Kurjak A., Kupesic S., Kostovic L. Vascularization of yolk sac and vitelline duct in normal pregnancies studied by transvaginal color and pulsed Doppler // J Perinat Med. 1994; 22(5): 433–40. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1994.22.5.433.

47. Kurjak A., Schulman H., Zudenigo D., Kupesic S., Kos M., Goldenberg M. Subchorionic hematomas in early pregnancy: clinical outcome and blood flow patterns. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Jan–Feb; 5(1): 41–4.

48. Jauniaux E., Moscoso J.G. Morphology and significance of the human yolk sac // The first twelve weeks of gestation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992. С. 192–213.